Menu
FASHIONISLANDBLOG
  • News
  • Fashion
  • AFL Guernsey Sale
  • gaa jerseys for sale
  • maillot lens
FASHIONISLANDBLOG

Trump Administration Says Uber, Gig Workers Are Contractors, Not Employees

Posted on April 30, 2019 by FASHIONISLANDBLOG

It’s one of the most contentious questions in the world of work these days: Who do Uber drivers and others in the gig economy really work for?

In the eyes of the Trump administration, they work for themselves.

The Labor Department announced Monday it had determined such workers are not employees but independent contractors, and therefore are not protected by labor standards like the minimum wage and overtime pay. The decision was laid out in what’s known as an opinion letter issued by the agency’s wage and hour division to let companies know where the agency stands on a hot-button issue.

By making such a determination, the agency came down on the side of companies like Uber, Lyft and Handy, which have long argued that those who do their work are not actually their workers. Many Silicon Valley startups have predicated their business models on the use of independent contractors, who must bear costs stemming from their jobs ― such as gasoline for vehicles ―while also forgoing basic protections afforded traditional employees.

The Labor Department issued its public letter to lawyers representing an unnamed “virtual marketplace company that operates in the so-called ‘on-demand’ or ‘sharing’ economy.”

Referring to workers as “service providers,” the letter makes the legal case that the Ubers of the world have been making for years: that the workers exercise their own control over their work and schedules, and therefore shouldn’t be considered employees under the law.

″[W]e conclude that your client’s service providers are independent contractors, not employees of your client,” the letter said. “The facts in your letter demonstrate economic independence, rather than economic dependence, in the working relationship between your client and its service providers.” 

The letter doesn’t mean workers cannot sue companies like Uber anymore and argue that they’re employees. But it does send a message to corporations that the Labor Department doesn’t intend to crack down on gig companies that use this model.

When the Labor Department was run by Democrats under the Obama administration, it was much more likely to call gig-economy workers employees rather than independent contractors. The agency’s high-ranking officials in the Obama era generally believed the proliferation of contractor arrangements was likely to lead to more exploitation, in part because workers couldn’t sue to recoup back pay they’re owed.

The National Employment Law Project, a left-leaning worker advocacy group, called Monday’s guidance letter a ”cynical interpretation of employment law,” and part of an effort to strip gig-economy workers of labor protections.

“Whatever gig company sought the opinion will likely use the letter as a ‘get out of jail free’ card to argue that it acted in good faith in classifying its workers as contractors,” said Rebecca Smith, director of the group’s work structures program.

Keith Sonderling, the acting administrator of the Labor Department’s wage and hour division, said the agency issued the letter in order to offer advice to “employers who want to do the right thing.”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • 学历提升:5大高效策略助你职场竞争力翻倍
  • 学历提升:5大高效策略助你轻松实现职场进阶
  • 学历提升:5大高效策略助你轻松实现职场跃迁
  • The Ultimate Guide to Style AI: Revolutionizing Fashion and Design
  • The Ultimate Guide to Short Drama: Captivating Stories in Minutes

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • August 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019

    Categories

    • Fashion
    • News

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2025 FASHIONISLANDBLOG | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes